<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Intellectual Autonomy on Bifurcations</title><link>https://bifurcations.org/en/tags/intellectual-autonomy/</link><description>Recent content in Intellectual Autonomy on Bifurcations</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-CA</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bifurcations.org/en/tags/intellectual-autonomy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI and the Myth of the Sovereign Mind</title><link>https://bifurcations.org/en/texts/ai-myth-sovereign-mind/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://bifurcations.org/en/texts/ai-myth-sovereign-mind/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;AI learns, predicts and recombines. Why should these operations be enough to rule out thought in machines when they also contribute to our own thinking?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are often told that artificial intelligence does not really think. It recognizes patterns, calculates probabilities and recombines what it has learned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That explanation led me to a question: to some extent, isn’t that what we do too?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We learn to speak by listening to others. We interpret a situation through our experiences, connect memories and anticipate a reaction. Even an original idea uses words and categories that came before us. Much of what we call our thinking took shape through contact with other people’s thinking.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>